Homework Disruption

Warning – Hot Topic!

Picture courtesy of Woodleywonderworks via Flickr
Picture courtesy of Woodleywonderworks via Flickr

Homework, especially for elementary students, has been under heavy scrutiny lately in the media. There are articles about schools who have discontinued it altogether, data that shows limited or no positive effects, suggestions of how to make it more authentic and choice based, and even warnings of how homework kills students’ love of learning.

As part of the Elementary Leadership Team (ELT) at my school, I suggested to the group that we rethink our homework practices mainly because I am the parent of two elementary students who absolutely hate homework! I knew if I – a teacher who had always believed in the value of responsibility and practicing skills at home – was now questioning my longtime beliefs from ‘the other side of the fence,’ there must be other dissatisfied parents who fight the daily battle of homework for no evidence of its benefit.

In discussion with the ELT, it was determined that there were many reasons we needed to reevaluate our homework as an elementary school:

  • Inconsistency:  Across the grade levels, and even within a grade level partners, we knew there were inconsistencies in the amount of homework given; homework being assigned on weekends or holidays; homework packets or online accounts (i.e. IXL or RAZ Kids); some paraprofessionals grade homework and hand it back; some teachers mark homework themselves and provide feedback; some teachers rely only on the data provided from the online accounts; some teachers made students complete unfinished work at recess; others sent notes home or took away class points; others did not have a consequence.
  • Research: We are aware of a growing body of data that questions the effectiveness of homework in elementary grades.
  • Parent Complaints: Our principal confirmed that she had been fielding a growing number of complaints from parents about their frustrations with homework. Some parents felt it was too much and their kids were unable to participate in after school activities. Some complained that they never saw the packets come back to determine if they and their child had done it correctly. A few even asked for more homework. Some families with multiple children or twins, noted many differences between the class policies and practices around homework.
  • Does it Support our Beliefs: Most importantly, we decided to take on this hot topic because we wanted to make sure that our homework guidelines and practices support our beliefs around student centered education, standards based assessment and reporting, relevancy and authenticity in education, and the development of the whole child.

We have a school wide ‘Guiding Document’ about homework that is actually pretty solid and leaves room for teachers to personalize their homework practices, while still following the general guidelines. The problem is that we need to do the work that must happen in between the rules and the practice in order to make it attainable for the teachers. While there are already many differing opinions at my school, admin has made it clear that discontinuing homework is not an option.

IMG_4081The ELT team decided that we would use the Design Process again, similar to the way we had redesigned our ePortfolios last year. In order for us to get past our own ideas, The Design Process works well for our team to rethink ‘sacred cows‘. To begin, the Empathy Stage forces us to examine our practices through the eyes of our customers – students and parents. In our first session of ‘Re-Thinking Homework’, we gathered in groups comprised of colleagues from different sections (i.e. early childhood, grades 1-2, grades 3-5, Arabic, and specials) and went through several scenarios that depicted a range of parent and student issues around homework. Here are two examples:

Child One is a native Arabic speaker, and for Arabic homework, the student must read each day for 15 minutes, journal once a week, and occasionally practice spelling words. Parent One feels this is very important work, and doesn’t want to cut back on Arabic homework. Child One has homeroom homework to read for 20 minutes, as well as practice pages and/or website problems in math, and sometimes writing. Most of the time the child is able to do the homework independently, so the parent is unsure how the child is doing on the homework. Child One is very active in after school activities and sports, but after the drive home, it is now 5:30. The family finds it very difficult to get the child’s homework done, eat dinner, get ready for bed, and get the child to sleep by 8. This schedule also leaves no time for Child One to choose to play outside, a game with the family, Legos, or watch a show.

Child Two is naturally inquisitive, often looking up information on the internet about various interests and reporting back to his parents and teachers all that he’s learned. Child Two is very interested in gaming and computer coding. He has been learning how to do these things at home on his own. Parents fight with him daily to do his homework, and although the homework is very easy for the child, he’s unmotivated to do it. Child Two is very active and is often up moving around the room, speaking out of turn, and needs redirection to return to tasks. At school the child is required to stay in at recess to finish the work.

As they read through all the scenarios, the teams determined wants and needs of the parents and students, and wrote them on sticky notes – one idea per note. After the teams had read through the scenarios, we sorted all the ideas into groups (the Define Stage). The major ‘wants and needs’ identified were:

  • Differentiated
  • Guidance and support
  • Communication
  • Feedback
  • Flexible Timings
  • More choice and interest
IMG_4121
Ideate Stage

In our second session, we did a carousel activity to add practical ideas to accommodate the wants and needs identified in our last session. After everyone had the chance to add their ideas, we also heard from a couple teachers who were already trying some new homework strategies with their class. One teacher shared several easy strategies that were used to meet the wide ranging needs in her class. For example, she posts her homework each night to her webpage and links the assignments to the external programs that differentiates by readiness and reports valuable data without her marking anything. She also always assigns a time limit, rather than a problem limit; some students might complete 10 problems in 15 minutes and other might only get through 5. The next teacher, from grade 5, had recently started to use passion projects for homework. He showed us the contracts and instructions he had developed, and also reported great success and enthusiasm from his students.TweetDeck

In our next session, keeping in mind our results from the previous stages, grade levels will develop prototypes of our homework plans. We will participate in another carousel to provide “2 Stars & a Wish” to give each other feedback or even gain a few more ideas.

Changes are already being tested! Photo courtesy of @DeidraWest3 via Twitter
Changes are already being tested!
Photo courtesy of @DeidraWest3 via Twitter

I have always thought that big changes were best tested at the end of a year so that I could come back in the fall with a solid plan. Similarly, the elementary teachers have agreed to put in place their prototypes for the month of May (Test Stage!) and gather feedback at the end of the year from both students and parents. The whole elementary school will also meet at the end of the year to discuss our findings in order to inform a “official” and more detailed elementary homework agreement.

This process has been lengthy and, at times, uncomfortable, but I know it’s been worth it. For the most part, all of the teachers have been excited about this process and agree that we can’t ignore this issue.  Youki Terada of Edutopia says it perfectly:

The question isn’t about homework vs. no homework; instead, we should be asking ourselves, “How can we transform homework so that it’s engaging, relevant, and supports learning?” 

I look forward to reporting back on our final agreement.

Agree to Disagree. For now.

IMG_1647
It looked much more blue in person, I swear!

On a walk with my husband, I pointed out how odd it was to have a light blue car.

“What?! That car is clearly white, Randi.”

“Noooo, that one is white. This one is light blue.”

We stopped to take pictures of each car to further examine this difference of opinion in “better” lighting at home.

IMG_1648
The very white car, for comparisons sake.

 

the dress
PHOTO: HTTP://SWIKED.TUMBLR.COM/

This timely debate ironically occurred during the Great Dress Debatewhich I had read about that morning on Glennon’s Momastry Blog. She calls this dress The BEST peacemaking tool she’s seen in a while. As interesting as the science is around why the dress is seen differently, the part of this debate (as Glennon mentions) that stands out, is the need to adjust our communication skills to allow for a space in the middle where we can give value to another point of view, but disagree politely.

Because the job of a technology integrationist heavily relies on the relationships you build with teachers, I give special attention to these types of lessons.

I recently had a conversation with a colleague who is frustrated by many of the new technologies I have suggested for use in his history class. After reading a post by Ann Durham, Adjust or Go Home, I was inspired to point out that he has an international fearlessness that he doesn’t apply to his technology use.  He argued that he is not a ‘bandwagon’ kind of guy and that the tools I am showing him will be “in and back out” in a flash. While I admit that the education system on the whole does cycle through way too many bandaid approaches, the use of technology to access, share, and create resources beyond the walls of school is here to stay. But… sensing his increased frustration, I instead listened and accepted his point of view (while politely disagreeing).

I believe that if we teachers don’t begin to update our teaching methods to provide a 21st century pedagogy, we will be outdated, irrelevant, and out of a job in the near future. Although this is my belief, I know that many people need to see and experience the value of these changes before they go through the trouble of learning them. Doing old things in new ways with a tech tool here and there, does not show the real value of technology to a teacher. But then, how can I make a believer out of one who won’t try?

This question, reminded me of a conversation with John Burns, Director of Innovation at Shekou International School. He advised me to start with the early adopters, the ‘LEADers’ of the group and showcase their work and accomplishments in order to bring the ‘wood be doing’ folks on board.

So, although I hate to skirt a good debate, after reading and reflecting this week, the path is clear. My best method for teachers who are not yet convinced that technology (used in the right way!) would add value to their classroom practices, is to showcase the results of the teachers in our school who already have an Innovator’s Mindset. At this point in our school, there is still room to politely disagree about using tools to flatten walls and globally connect – but that is changing.

Our minds are built to make sense of the world using our surroundings. Just like our minds interpreted the dress color differently, those of us who have been teaching a long time with ‘tried and true’ practices are still interpreting our classroom and students’ results as a success. But what they don’t see is that even though students passed their memorization and paper/pencil tests, they will enter higher education or the workforce at a disadvantage because they are without 21st Century Solution Fluencies.